In June 1996, the Commission adopted
a definition of disability that will now be used by all employers
with equity programs.
The Commission found that employers
with equity programs were using different definitions for people
with disabilities, which created difficulty for Commission staff,
for job-seekers, and members of that designated group.
The Commission solicited input on the
definition from organizations representing people with disabilities
and from equity employers.
The definition of disability that will
now be used by equity employers is:
For Equity purposes, persons with disabilities
are persons who:
(a) have a persistent physical, intellectual,
mental, psychiatric, sensory or learning condition that:
(i) requires a technical device and/or
personal support or service to do the essential functions of the
job; or
(ii) requires a modification of job
site, job responsibility, adjustment of work hours, extra rest
breaks or time off/leave to obtain treatment as necessary; |
|
and
(b) consider themselves to be, and have
reason to believe an employer or a potential employer would consider
them to be disadvantaged in finding, retaining or advancing in
employment because of that condition.
The long-term goal for this designated
group is now 9.7 percent. That reflects the number of people with
disabilities in the labour force as a whole. Equity employers
will work toward the goal of having 9.7 percent of their workforce
made up of people with disabilities.
Prior to June 1996, the Commission accepted
two numerical goals for this group, one 9.7 percent, the other
16.6 percent. The difference in the two goals reflected the different
ways employers were defining people with disabilities. Now that
the Commission has adopted a definition of disability for employment
equity employers, there will be only the one goal of 9.7 percent.
When setting this goal, the Commission
used statistics from the provincial Disabilities Directorate's
1991 Health and Activity Limitation Survey.
|
Changing terminology
The Commission is currently assessing
how the word race is used in The Saskatchewan Human
Rights Code and, as well, how Commissioners and staff use
that word in their day-to-day work.
Are we using the word race in
a way that divides people into groups? The focus should be placed
|
|
on racism and not on the presumed race of individuals. One way
to move away from divisions based on race is to remove the word
race from the Code as a protected category. (It
would be replaced with the word ancestry.) Another strategy
is to replace the work race with the phrase perceived
race.
The Commission has consulted a few organizations
on this issue. We know it is a concern, and invite individuals
and community groups to let us know their point of view.
|