|
As some of you know, the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission issued
a report in 1985 called Education Equity. It expressed concern with
the extremely high drop-out rate of students of Aboriginal ancestry
before they graduated from high school.
At the time, some people questioned what business
it was of the Commission to involve itself
in the education system. The answer lies in
Section 13(1) of The Saskatchewan Human Rights
Code which states:
"Every person and every class of persons shall enjoy the right to
education in any school,
college, university or other institution or place
of learning, vocational training or apprenticeship without discrimination
because of his or their race, creed, religion, colour, sex,
sexual orientation, family status, marital status, disability, nationality,
ancestry, place of origin or receipt of public assistance."
It was quite apparent
that students of Aboriginal ancestry were not
benefiting from the education system to the same extent as non-Aboriginal
students. Consequently, the Commission initiated the
concept of education equity plans in those school divisions whose
student body was comprised of 5% or more of students of
Aboriginal ancestry.
These plans consisted of five components:
- hiring more teachers of Aboriginal ancestry;
- increasing Aboriginal content in the curriculum;
- increasing parental involvement in school activities;
- making sure school policies and practices did not have
an
adverse impact on students of Aboriginal ancestry;
- providing cross-cultural training for teachers.
Two additional
components were later added:
- hiring Aboriginal people into the non-teaching positions;
- developing
anti-racism policies and procedures.
The twenty school divisions that developed these plans submitted
reports annually to the Commission.
1999-2000 Reports
Fifty percent of all K – 12 students in the province are in school
divisions with approved equity plans. This excludes the Saskatchewan
Rivers Division whose statistical report was not available
this year.
What are the results of the equity plans? There are many positive
outcomes.
We have seen concerted efforts to hire teachers of Aboriginal
ancestry;
some school divisions having more success than others.
We have seen the curriculum change to include a significant
reference
to Aboriginal culture. Work is ongoing in this area.
We have seen many innovative initiatives to involve parents
in
school activities, including the introduction of elders into the
classroom.
We have seen the development and implementation of
anti-racism
policies.
|
|
These are a very few of the positive initiatives. There
is much still to be done. In August 1997, the Commission along
with its partners in education equity at the time: Saskatchewan Education,
Saskatchewan School Trustees Association, Saskatchewan
Teachers’ Federation and the League of Education Administrators,
Directors and Superintendents issued a document titled
"Our Children, Our Communities and Our
Future". Its subtitle is "Equity in Education:
A Policy Framework". It calls on
all school divisions to adopt a concept of
education equity that allows all students to
reach their full potential in the K – 12 system.
Post secondary education institutions joined the Education Equity
Forum in recent years. The Commission is pleased to work with
the University of Regina, the University of Saskatchewan and Gabriel
Dumont Institute along with its former education partners.
In this year’s reports, it is gratifying to see a number of school
divisions
expanding their equity initiatives. While maintaining efforts
to make the school experience more rewarding for Aboriginal students,
they are sensitive to issues in the community, gender issues and
special needs issues.
2000-2001 And Beyond
Two big issues are currently being tackled.
How does a school division introduce this broad concept of equity?
To be successful requires support beyond those directly involved in providing education in
the classroom. School divisions are taking tentative
steps in a variety of ways, depending on the environment in
which they function.
Prince Albert Roman Catholic Separate School Division has a
Social Justice Committee
that looks at many factors that affect the success
of its students.
Indian Head School Division has a Community of Hope
project
that deals with a variety of issues that hinder students from
succeeding.
Saskatoon Public School Division has several committees to deal
with specific areas of
concern. For example, there is an English as a
Second Language Committee that will develop a handbook for classroom
teachers on integrating ESL students and modifying curriculum
and instruction. Another example is a Personal and Social
Development Committee that evaluates resources that aim to
support a caring community of learners.
This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of all the initiatives
taken by school
divisions that broaden the concept of equity as set out
in the policy framework document. They are only examples of various
initiatives that are heading down that road.
The second major issue is:
How does a school division measure success?
In order to know if initiatives are having the effect intended,
there have to be
some indicators of success.
These are some of the ways the school boards say success can
be measured:
- enrolment trends and reasons for students leaving school
- academic achievement as measured by Canadian Test of
Basis
Skills
continued...
|